+--server-tuning
| +--dd
| +--fdtree
| +--fs
| +--loader
| +--memcached
| +--metadata
| +--network
| +--perflog
| | +--cron-perflog
| | +--sample-output
| +--postgres
| +--postmark
| +--raid
| +--ram
| +--scaling
| +--swap
| Filesystem notes
==> io-tuning.pdf <==
==> linuxcon2010_wheeler.pdf <==
==> billion-files <==
http://lwn.net/Articles/400629/
One billion files on Linux
Jonathan Corbet
Wed, 18 Aug 2010
What happens if you try to put one billion files onto a Linux filesystem?
One might see this as an academic sort of question; even the most
enthusiastic music downloader will have to work a while to collect that
much data. It would require over 30,000 (clean) kernel trees to add up
to a billion files. Even contemporary desktop systems, which often seem
==> disk-tuning <==
http://www.softpanorama.org/Commercial_linuxes/performance_tuning.shtml
1. For fast disk subsystems, it is desirable to use large flushes of
dirty memory pages.
The value stored in /proc/sys/vm/dirty_background_ratio defines at
what percentage of main memory the pdflush daemon should write data
out to the disk.
If larger flushes are desired then increasing the default value of 10%
==> linux-filesystem-tune-up <==
http://www.linux.com/learn/tutorials/384597-weekend-project-linux-filesystem-tune-up
Weekend Project: Linux Filesystem Tune-up
Nathan Willis
Thu, 25 Nov 2010 05:48:00 -0500
Introduction
If the thought of getting up at 3AM on "Black Friday" and dragging yourself
across town to stand in line for sales doesn't fill you with the holiday
spirit, why not spend your weekend doing something more meaningful,
==> pdflush-tuning <==
http://www.westnet.com/~gsmith/content/linux-pdflush.htm
The Linux Page Cache and pdflush:
Theory of Operation and Tuning for Write-Heavy Loads
Gregory Smith
Wed, 26 Mar 2008 11:37:37 -0400
Introduction
As you write out data ultimately intended for disk, Linux caches this
information in an area of memory called the page cache. You can find out
==> xfs-recommendation-1 <==
Message-ID: <4DAE0FF0.5070805@hardwarefreak.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2011 17:42:56 -0500
From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@hardwarefreak.com>
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: file systems
References: <87wriqjd0t.fsf@towardsfreedom.com>
In-Reply-To: <87wriqjd0t.fsf@towardsfreedom.com>
prad put forth on 4/19/2011 1:45 PM:
> we are thinking of redoing our existing servers and workstations in
==> xfs-recommendation-2 <==
From SRS0=LM0p=MF=lists.debian.org=bounce-debian-user=vogelke+debian=pobox.com@bounce2.pobox.com Mon Apr 26 06:03:10 2010
Message-ID: <4BD562A7.3050907@hardwarefreak.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2010 04:53:43 -0500
From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@hardwarefreak.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Filesystem recommendations
References: <o2p258ced3f1004241053j28352c68v7fa61b56b021443b@mail.gmail.com>
<4BD3425F.6080301@cox.net> <4BD3DEEF.7050305@allums.com>
<4BD53D53.9050205@hardwarefreak.com> <4BD54D42.3030701@allums.com>
==> xfs-recommendation-3 <==
Message-ID: <4DBD0D23.1080903@hardwarefreak.com>
Date: Sun, 01 May 2011 02:34:59 -0500
From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@hardwarefreak.com>
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: file systems
References: <87wriqjd0t.fsf@towardsfreedom.com>
<4DAE0FF0.5070805@hardwarefreak.com> <4DB513E5.5030902@cox.net>
<4DB5CC72.4070106@hardwarefreak.com> <4DB5EDAB.6010706@cox.net>
<4DB60919.6080403@hardwarefreak.com> <4DB60C9E.4090104@cox.net>
<4DB630D1.9040005@hardwarefreak.com> <4DB646ED.8080909@cox.net>
|